 |
|
Scientific Report 2006
Molecular Biology
Cytochrome ba3
From Thermus thermophilus: New Windows on the Mechanisms of Energy
Transduction by Cytochrome c Oxidases
J.A. Fee, Y. Chen
A relatively
small integral-membrane protein containing 2 iron and 3 copper atoms distributed
in 3 redox active sites generates approximately one third of a humans metabolic
energy. That enzyme is cytochrome c oxidase, and its mechanism of action
remains a mystery. The enzyme was first recognized by Charles MacMunn as histohaematin
in the 1880s and was studied intensely by Otto Warburg as atmungsferment
during the 1920s and 1930s and by David Keilin as cytochrome into the
late 1950s. Today, cytochrome c oxidase is still the subject of an international
effort.
Cytochrome c oxidase catalyzes
the following deceptively simple reaction:
4 cytochrome c2+
+ O2 + 8 H+in ®
4 cytochrome c3+ + 2 H2O + 4 H+out,
where the subscripts in and
out refer, respectively, to matrix and the intermembrane space of the mitochondrion
or, in bacteria, to the cytoplasm and the periplasmic space. The free energy of
dioxygen reduction is thus captured as a proton gradient; the out side is
positive and the in side is negative.
During the past 5 decades, enormous
progress has been realized in understanding the chemical properties of the 3 redox
centers, and the enzyme from several different sources has been crystalized and
its structure determined at resolutions ranging from about 3 to 1.8 Å. Moreover,
much has been learned about the pathways of electron transfer within the enzyme
and the detailed mechanisms whereby the oxygen molecule is reduced to 2 water molecules.
The outstanding questions pertain to the flow of protons into the enzyme from its
in side, across the hydrophobic core of the membrane, to exit on its out
side. The mystery lies in how all this scalar chemistry comes together to pump
4 protons across the membrane. Although the enzyme has been examined by using virtually
every available spectroscopic technique, no one has addressed directly the pathways
of those protons becoming either water or part of the proton gradient.
Much of the past work was done with
enzymes in a single clade typified by the mitochondrial enzyme (derived from an
ancient bacterium) and with enzymes isolated from common bacteria, notably Rhodobacter
sphaeroides, Paraccocus denitrificans, and Escherichia coli (the
quinol oxidase). The enzymes from these sources are highly similar in amino acid
sequence, 3-dimensional structure, electron-transfer paths, mechanism of oxygen
reduction, and, most likely, mechanisms of proton pumping. Our research is based
on a 1988 description of a highly sequence-divergent form of the enzyme from Thermus
thermophilus, cytochrome ba3, that represents a distinct
clade of enzymes widely distributed among archaebacteria. Respectively, these clades
represent A- and B-type oxidases.
We recently developed a homologous
expression system for cytochrome ba3. This system allows
easy purification of the enzyme in amounts of 23 mg/L of culture medium by
using an N-terminal heptahistidine tag on subunit I. The recombinant enzyme is equally
active with native, wild-type protein, and the results of a 2.3-Å x-ray structure
determination, done in collaboration with C.D. Stout, Department of Molecular Biology,
revealed the expected details at full occupancy and at least one notable surprise.
All the A-type oxidases have a glutamic
acid residue within the hydrophobic interior of the enzyme that is thought to be
at the end of the D pathway of proton transport and close to the Fea3-CuB
site of dioxygen reduction (Fig. 1A). Mutation of this residue to, for example,
glutamine blocks all but a small percentage of the enzymes electron-transfer
activity, and infrared studies indicate that this residue senses changes
in the chemical structure of the dioxygen reduction site. Indeed, scientists think
that glutamate 286 actually donates the pumped proton to the exit part of the molecule,
becoming deprotonated with a pKa of about 9.4. However, no direct
evidence exists for this notion, and because glutamate 286 resides
in a highly hydrophobic region of the structure, its pKa most
likely is much higher.
 |
| Fig. 1. Cross-eyed
stereo view of the Fea3-CuB binuclear active-site structures
(leftmost Fe and Cu) of the cytochrome aa3 from R sphaeroides
(A) and the cytochrome ba3 from T thermophilus (B),
emphasizing the overlapping position of the glutamate 286 (Glu-238) in R sphaeroides
and the isoleucine 235 (Ile-235) in T thermophilus. Under the influence of
oxygen reduction, protons most likely enter the protein from the upper left of the
figure and exit at the lower right. |
The
surprise in the structure of cytochrome ba3 is that an
isoleucine residue is isopositional with glutamate 286 as isoleucine 235, as shown
in Fig. 1B. We mutated this residue to both a glutamine and a glutamate residue
in the cytochrome with no apparent loss of electron-transfer activity. To determine
if the substituted glutamate residue can be used to monitor changes in the Fea3-CuB
pair, as it does in the A-type oxidases, we have initiated an infrared study of
these mutant proteins in collaboration with R. Gennis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign,
Illinois, and J. Heberle, Jülich Research Center, Jülich, Germany. How
these studies will advance our understanding of proton-pumping mechanisms remains
unclear. What is clear is that cytochrome ba3 provides
new openings to explore the mechanism of the cytochrome oxidases.
Publications
Chen, Y., Hunsicker-Wang, L.M.,
Pacoma, R.L., Luna, E., Fee, J.A. A homologous expression
system for obtaining engineered cytochrome ba3 from Thermus
thermophilus HB8. Protein Expr. Purif. 40:299, 2005.
Farver, O., Chem, Y., Fee,
J.A., Pecht, I. Electron transfer among the CuA-,
heme b- and a3-centers of Thermus thermophilus
cytochrome ba3. FEBS Lett. 580:3417, 2006.
Hunsicker-Wang,
L.M., Pacoma, R.L., Chen, Y., Fee, J.A., Stout, C.D. A
novel cryoprotection scheme for enhancing the diffraction of crystals of recombinant
cytochrome ba3 oxidase from Thermus thermophilus.
Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 61(Pt. 3):340, 2005.
|
 |