 |
|
Scientific Report 2006
Molecular Biology
Mechanisms of RNA Assembly and Catalysis
M.J. Fedor, E.M. Calderon, J.W. Cottrell, C.P. Da Costa, S. Daudenarde, J.W. Harger, Y.I. Kuzmin, E.M.
Mahen, M. Roychowdhury-Saha
Our
goal is to generate basic insights into catalysis by RNA and RNA-protein enzymes,
RNA folding, and RNA interactions with small molecules. In addition to contributing
basic knowledge of RNA structure and function in normal growth and development,
results of our studies provide a framework for developing technical and therapeutic
applications involving RNAs as targets and reagents.
Apart from the ribosome, which catalyzes
peptidyl transfer, the naturally occurring ribozymes catalyze transfer of phosphate
groups. The small RNA enzymes that we study catalyze reversible phosphodiester cleavage
reactions that generate 5′
hydroxyl and 2′,3′-cyclic
phosphate termini (Fig. 1). Possible strategies for catalysis of phosphoryl transfer
reactions include aligning reactive groups in an optimal orientation for an in-line
attack mechanism, general acid-base catalysis of proton transfer to activate nucleophilic
oxygens or to stabilize oxyanion-leaving groups, electrostatic stabilization of
negative charge that accumulates in the transition state, and destabilizing the
ground state. Our goal is to understand which of these catalytic strategies RNA
enzymes use.
 |
| >Fig. 1. Chemical
mechanism of RNA cleavage mediated by the family of small catalytic RNAs that includes
the hairpin ribozyme. Cleavage of the phosphodiester bond occurs through an SN2-type
mechanism that involves in-line attack of the 2′
oxygen nucleophile on the adjacent phosphorus to form a trigonal bipyramidal transition
state. Breaking of the 5′
oxygen-phosphorus bond generates products with 5′
hydroxyl and 2′,3′-cyclic
phosphate termini. |
In contrast to the chemical versatility
of the amino acid side chains that make up the active sites of protein enzymes,
just 4 nucleotides are available for the construction of ribozyme active sites.
Nucleotides are well suited to faithful storage and transmission of genetic information through
complementary base pairing, but they are not particularly adept at catalytic chemistry.
Protonation and deprotonation of nucleotides occur at high or low pH extremes, a
situation that would make it difficult to mediate general acid or base catalysis
at neutral pH. No positively charged nucleotide functional groups are expected to
be available at neutral pH to function as Lewis acids to activate a nucleophile
or stabilize an electronegative transition state or an oxyanion-leaving group.
Recent
high-resolution structures of self-cleaving RNAs lay the groundwork for experiments
to probe fundamental questions about how RNA enzymes use their functional groups
for catalysis. Like all enzymes, hairpin ribozymes combine several strategies to
enhance catalytic rate. One important strategy, apparent from the crystal structures,
is the alignment of nucleophilic and leaving-group oxygens in the optimal orientation
for an in-line SN2-type nucleophilic attack. The structure of the hairpin
ribozyme active site places guanine 8, adenine 9, adenine 10, and adenine 38 nucleobases
near the reactive phosphate. Guanine 8 and adenine 38 occupy positions reminiscent
of 2 histidine residues in the active site of ribonuclease A, a protein enzyme that
catalyzes the same reaction. Histidine residues perform general acid-base catalysis
during ribonuclease A catalysis, so the similarity between hairpin ribozyme and
ribonuclease A active sites raised the possibility that guanine 8 and adenine 38
nucleobases might perform functions similar to those of histidine residues.
Hairpin ribozyme activity increases
with increasing pH, consistent with the notion that activity depends on the availability
of the deprotonated form of guanine 8 to accept a proton from the 2′
hydroxyl nucleophile as predicted by the general acid-base catalysis model. To test
this model, we replaced guanine 8 with an abasic residue, a substitution that eliminates
the nucleobase but leaves the phosphodiester backbone intact. However, this abasic
variant had the same pH dependence as an unmodified ribozyme, arguing that the pH
transition does not involve guanine 8. Replacing adenine 38 with an abasic residue,
on the other hand, did eliminate the pH-dependent transition in activity, implicating
adenine 38 in a catalytically important deprotonation.
These and other results are consistent
with 2 models of the hairpin ribozyme catalytic mechanism in which adenine 38 contributes
either general acid-base catalysis (Fig. 2A) or electrostatic stabilization of negative
charge that develops in the transition state as 5 electronegative oxygen atoms from
transient bonds with phosphorus (Fig. 2B) and guanine 8 donates hydrogen bonds to
stabilize the transition state electrostatically.
 |
| Fig. 2. Two models of hairpin ribozyme catalysis. Results
of mechanistic studies of the hairpin ribozyme are consistent with 2 models in which
the functional form of adenine 38 is either protonated or unprotonated. In the first
model (A), protonated adenine 38 would act as a general acid by donating a proton
to the 5′ oxygen, acting in concert with hydroxide ion that activates the 2′
oxygen nucleophile during cleavage, and unprotonated adenine 38 would act as a general
base to activate the 5′ oxygen nucleophile during ligation. In the second model (B), unprotonated adenine
38 accepts a hydrogen bond from the 5′ hydroxyl nucleophile during ligation and accepts a hydrogen bond from a protonated
bridging 5′ oxygen during cleavage, providing electrostatic stabilization to developing negative charge. In
both models, the amidine group of guanine 8, in its protonated form, donates hydrogen
bonds to the 2′ and phosphoryl oxygens that stabilize negative charge that develops in the transition state and
positions reactive groups in the orientation appropriate for an SN2 in-line
nucleophilic attack. Reproduced with permission from Fedor, M.J., Williamson, J.R.
The catalytic diversity of RNAs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6:399, 2005. Copyright 2005 Nature Publishing Group/Macmillan Magazines Ltd. |
|
 |